Frapper - to Knock, Hit - French Verb Conjugations

The Presentation of Socrates Arguements in Plato’s...

In both Plato’s Apology and Crito, Plato presents Socrates arguments clearly and precisely. Socrates is wise man with a different perspective on life, which presents us with a mass of contradictions. Socrates is an expressive man, yet he never recorded any works. He is ignorant, but wrongfully convicted who is willing to fight his unjust execution. Behind these dilemmas is an opposition not often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic of philosophers, who is dedicated to his state. Exploring this contradiction between Socrates the loyal citizen and Socrates the philosophical man will help position Platos arguments. Although, Socrates approach to his defense in my opinion is not the best, and is certainly not an apology. The argument in†¦show more content†¦This perspective of Socrates represented by Plato demonstrates the difference between a man accused of wrong doings and a man who is being condemned. When Socrates is informed of the final decision by the jury he again keeps his composure and states in his defense speech by emphasizing that he is alright with the way he presented himself instead of begging and pleading. Finally, Socrates tells the jury â€Å"that there is hope in death and that he will enter into it with no fear†(Yount). His final request is for the jurymen to make sure that his sons grow up in the right way and praises some of the jurors who voted for his innocence. In Plato’s Crito Socrates argues that it would be wrong for him to escape from prison. Speaking to his friend Cirto, Socrates explains that escaping from prison would go against many of his beliefs. Socrates believes in seeking the truth, not repaying a wrong with another wrong, and obeying the laws of the state. He also states that escaping from prison would ruin his reputation and is in best interest for everyone. Crito brings up many arguments to Socrates trying to convince him to escape. Crito tries to appeal to Socrates in many different ways and bombards him with many arguments. Every argument that Crito brings up to Socrates, he answers with carful thinking and analysis. Crito appeals to Socrates emotions by stating that his friends and family will be lost without him. He

Introduction to Professionalism-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: What is a Professional? How does the definition of 'Professional' that is provided in the textbook differ from how it is used in everyday language? Answer: According to Sir William Shaw, a professional is a person who has achieved a specialized knowledge that is usually gained through years of experience in university study or forms of larger group, and continuing professional development (Shaw Barry, 2015). Due to high field experience, they treasure fundamental knowledge in certain aspect of business domain such as statisticians, physicists or researchers of any specific field. In everyday life, the term Professional is normally used for having a particular profession that is chosen to earn livelihood as a permanent career. The person who is engaged in certain kind of activity through which he is receiving financial returns are said to be as professional. However, an actual professional is different from our common sense of understanding. As said in Shaws book of Moral Issues in Business, a professional is someone who is formally certified by a professional body by virtue of having achieved an acclaimed level of proficiency in a trade (Shaw Barry, 2015). They treasure fundamental knowledge in certain aspect of business domain such as statistics, physicists or researching etc. He is a professional in proper sense. According to Shaws definition the best example of a professional is- When a customer comes to an accountant for financial advice, the professional is the accountant on whose knowledge; the customer is relying for his cause. Similarly, when a patient goes to a doctor for his health crisis, the professional is the doctor on whose specialized medical knowledge the patient is relying for his cause. A footballer and a golfer are also said to be a professional but they do not meet the criteria of Sir William Shaws definition of professional. They are paid for undertaking a specialized set of tasks and they complete them for fee. It is not mandatory for them to be certified by any professional body or to have a high field experience in university study. It is their talent in the specific field they are been paid for and they are known by the name of professional footballer and professional golfer. Professionals too have special moral obligations that exceed those of ordinary individuals (Shaw Barry, 2015). The reason behind it is professional are the experts in certain field and their work has the ability to influence either negatively or positively. This provides them the advantage over the ordinary people and society depends on professionals specialized knowledge (Shaw Barry, 2015). For example, people seeks advice from professional teachers for their children, they takes advice from professional doctors when they are sick. This reliance creates a special kind of social contract, between the professional and the society and hence, bringing with its moral obligations. A dilemma is a situation in which a person find himself difficult to choose between the given alternatives. It is usually the time when a difficult choice is to be made among the ones that are more or less equally undesirable. It is a situation, which has the potential to challenge an agreeable solution. They are three types of dilemmas including ethical, classic and moral. In the workplace, people often face ethical and more or less moral dilemmas. An ethical dilemma can be- taking credit for other persons work, or conducting any personal business during company time. However, moral dilemma is a situation where a person gets confused between the right and the wrong (Shaw Barry, 2015). An Informed consent is a legal and ethical requirement for research and it involves human participants. It is a process where the participant is manually informed about all the different aspects of trial that are important for him to make the decision. After studying all the aspects of the trial, he voluntarily confirms willingness to participate or not. It implies deliberation and free choice. An employee must be provided with all significant facts related to the information gathering procedure and understand its consequences. When the worker who has agreed to abide by a workplace policy not have given informed consent they might look for work elsewhere (Shaw Barry, 2015). It is very important for the company to give their employee informed consent and employees must understand what they are working to. They must be allowed to proceed based on sufficient usable information (Shaw Barry, 2015). Free choice is very important. Ethics deals with individual character and the moral rule that govern and sets a limit to his conduct. The main purpose of ethics is to investigate the questions about duties and obligations, fairness and unfairness, right and wrongs, justice and injustice, and the principles and values that should guide a person (Shaw Barry, 2015). Reference Shaw, W. H Barry V. (2015). Moral Issues In Business. Cengage Learning